Contact Us for a Free Consultation 844-589-2889


Are SIRVA Injuries on the rise?

Posted by Richard H. Moeller | May 24, 2017 | 0 Comments

Last month I wrote about changes to the Vaccine Richard Moeller - Vaccine Injury AttorneyInjury Table, which included adding SIRVA injuries.  The decision to add this type of injury came about after a study of shoulder injuries was conducted by Dr. Sarah Atanasoff for the United States Department of Health and Human Services.  According to Dr. Atanasoff, a review of claims filed with the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) showed a pattern emerging with common features of shoulder pain following vaccination, with most being the seasonal flu shot. The study referred to this type of injury as “SIRVA” which stands for shoulder injury related to vaccine administration.  Often the patients felt that the injection had been too high in the arm or shoulder area, and experienced shoulder pain beyond the site of the shot.

The change in the Table recognizes that now, much more than in years past, many of the claims filed and entitled to compensation from the VICP are due to SIRVA.  And in our own experience, most of the cases we have filed in the last few years involve shoulder injuries following a flu shot or other vaccination, compared to the neurological conditions resulting from vaccines.  This trend makes sense if, as Dr. Atanasoff found, literature supports the possibility that these shoulder injuries can be traced to the inappropriate technique of injection, and if you consider the larger number of flu shots administered every year by non-typical vaccine administrators, such as pharmacists.  So, it may be that SIRVA injuries in the VICP are on the rise just because there are more vaccinations given every year and a growing awareness of that in rare instances they can lead to complications.  We list many of these conditions associated with SIRVA.

When our firm is contacted by a person who believes they may have suffered any injury from one of the vaccines covered by the VICP, there is no fee to visit about the claim, or to investigate the claim, or to pursue the claim.  You can contact us about a possible Vaccine Injury by visiting our Contact page. And you can learn more about the VICP and the firm's representation of persons with possible Vaccine Injury claims by visiting our Vaccine Injury Pros website and other articles in our Blog.

About the Author

Richard H. Moeller

Richard, a partner since 1996, has a broad practice, but practices primarily in litigated matters (vaccine injury, discrimination, & foreclosures), appellate practice, banking law, personal injury law, product liability, trial law at both the state and federal level.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Thank you for visiting our website!

Please be advised that access to information on this website does not create an attorney-client relationship, and any transmission or receipt of information on this website will not be privileged, does not constitute legal advice and does not create any duty of the firm to any person. An attorney-client relationship will not be established until we have entered into a written engagement agreement. Therefore, do not send us any confidential information about a matter until we have agreed to act as your lawyers.

The determination of legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and we hope this website provides you with helpful information about the type of legal services we provide. A description of a lawyer’s areas of practice does not mean that any organization or agency has certified such lawyer as a specialist or expert.

If you are a potential client, you are urged to make your own independent investigation and evaluation of any lawyer being considered. In considering a lawyer’s results in published cases or other matters, please be aware that each legal matter is unique and that prior results may not be representative of all matters undertaken by the lawyer and you should not rely on prior results being indicative of future success in similar matters.